Although your arrangements with your graphic designer may not have been very detailed I would argue that (if in fact it was copied) there was an implied contractual condition that you would receive an original design. From this you can argue that your designer has breached this condition and should put you in the position you should have been in if the condition had not been breached ie all the costs of re-branding or the license fee’s that the original designer is claiming. I wouldn’t accept as compensation the designer creating the new logo etc as they clearly can’t be trusted to do original work! Your other argument is negligence – the designer has breached its duty of care by exposing you to forseeable and expensive copyright infringement and the costs of re-branding if you end up doing this.
COMMENTS
SmartCompany is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while it is being reviewed, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.