Private treaty discounting has become necessary to secure sales across most capital cities.
Brisbane listings require the highest level of reduction, with a typical 9.6% discount needed against the original asking price, according to Australian Property Monitors.
Perth ranked second with an 8.6% discount required, according to the recently released August data.
Canberra vendors typically needed to adjust their expectations the least, with a required 4.1% price adjustment to secure a sale.
Discounting increased considerably across all capital cities in the past year, with the exception of Canberra.
Sydney’s discounting shift over the past year was second only to Canberra’s with the required discounting increasing from 6.2% in August 2010 to 6.9% in August this year.
But Sydney’s 6.9% August figure was the highest for any month this year for the city.
Melbourne’s 7.2% figure was the highest August discount required since 2004.
Buyer and seller expectations are still disconnected, Australian Property Monitors senior economist Andrew Wilson noted just before the spring selling season got underway.
He noted that days on market, discount rates and stock on market numbers were all higher than at the same time last year in the Sydney and Melbourne markets.
But Enzo Raimondo, chief executive of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria, recently noted there had been an increase in the use of the term “discounting” to describe property markets.
He says the term only describes the difference between the estimate price and not necessarily the real value.
“Unfortunately, it is a term that fundamentally misunderstands the notion of value and price in residential real estate,” Raimondo says.
“It must be remembered that in most cases that a price on a real estate advertisement is under Victorian law an estimation.
“The estimate is often based on recent comparable sales and the real estate agent’s judgment,” he says.
“It is not necessarily the price the vendor will sell for, as that often fluctuates over the course of a sales campaign.”
Source: APM August data
This article first appeated on Property Observer.
COMMENTS
SmartCompany is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while it is being reviewed, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.