While Federal Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has sent shockwaves through Telstra this morning be effectively demanding that the company separate its retail and wholesale division, he may have also sparked a three-way fight between Australia’s three great media moguls – Rupert Murdoch (well, he’s sort of Australian), James Packer and Kerry Stokes – by announcing the Government wants Telstra to sell its 50% stake in Foxtel.
Australia’s growing love of pay TV – subscriber numbers rose 8% to 1.63 million in 2008-09 – has made Foxtel one of the most sort after assets in the Australian media sector.
Indeed, this was seen as the big reason that Kerry Stokes’ Seven Network snapped up just under 20% of James Packer’s Consolidated Media in July: ConsMedia owns 25% of Foxtel and a stake in pay TV content producer, Premier Media.
Today’s announcement should make Consolidated Media a prime takeover target for Stokes, Packer (who owns just over 40%) or another interested party, like Rupert Murdoch, whose News Corporation owns the other 25% of Foxtel. If Stokes, Packer or Murdoch could grab Telstra’s 50% stake, and then take out Consolidated Media, they could grab a stranglehold on Australia’s pay television market.
This would also set up one of the greatest media mogul battles Australia has ever seen.
Given this, you might have thought ConsMedia’s shares would have soared today. They haven’t. At 11:45am AEST, the shares were up just 2.4%.
Part of the reason might be the little deal that Packer and Stokes did last week, whereby Packer gave Stokes two seats on the ConsMedia board in exchange for a promise that Seven Network would not buy any more shares in ConsMedia for the next 12 months.
The standstill agreement is subject to “certain exemptions”. The only problem, as Bryan Frith points out in The Australian today, is that no-one knows that those exemptions are.
For example, does the fact that Telstra’s Foxtel stake may soon be up for grabs constitute one of those “certain exemptions”?
If so, then Stokes could well be tempted to launch a full takeover bid for Consolidated Media, which would almost certainly push the company’s share price a lot higher than 2.4%.
And if the sale of Telstra Foxtel stake doesn’t constitute an exception to Stokes’ standstill agreement, then the minority shareholders in Consolidated Media – that is, all of those investors not named James Packer – are entitled to ask whether the standstill agreement was really in their best interests.
COMMENTS
SmartCompany is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while it is being reviewed, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.