The Australian Taxation Office has for the first time released the names of large private companies that paid no corporate tax during a financial year, as part of a strategy to increase transparency and trust in the tax system.
The report, which examines Australian private companies with total income of $200 million or more, shows 30% did not pay any corporate tax in 2014.
Of those private companies, 12% were exempt from handing over cash to the ATO because they incurred an accounting loss for the current year.
Others did not pay tax because they utilised prior year losses or franking credits, while some companies on the list have related entities that did pay tax.
Some of the companies are also entitled to offsets, such as those associated with the Research and Development Tax Incentive.
Here are some of the private companies that paid no company tax for the 2013-14 financial year:
- Pratt Consolidated Holdings, which reported a total income of $2.58 billion and a taxable income of $87.84 million
- Australia’s largest winemaker, Accolade Wines, which had a total income of $400 million
- Cinema company Hoyts, which posted revenue of $417 million according to the ATO data
- Food giant Bartter, owned by the Baiada family, also paid no tax. It had a taxable income of $1.47 billion in 2013-14.
- McDonald’s Asia Pacific Consortium, which had $478 million in revenue during the same period.
Hancock Prospecting paid the most tax of any private company
Gina Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting, meanwhile, paid $466 million in company tax – far more than any other private company during the 2013-14 period.
Harry Triguboff’s company, Meriton Properties, meanwhile, recorded a total income of $1.19 billion for the same period and paid $75.92 million in company tax.
Tax commissioner Chris Jordan said in a statement paying no tax does not necessarily mean a company is avoiding its tax obligations.
“At the ATO, we risk assess 100% of the privately owned and wealthy group population to ensure companies comply with their tax obligations,” Jordan said.
“A key characteristic of private groups is that they are part of complex group structures. The ATO takes a whole-of-group view when assessing tax owed.
“While most do the right thing, we closely investigate any companies with unusual financial or taxation numbers.”
More transparency a good thing for small business
Peter Strong, chief executive of the Council of Small Business of Australia, told SmartCompany he welcomes the push for transparency when it comes to which companies are paying tax in Australia.
“The tax system is so important,” Strong says.
“It’s got to be transparent. It’s got to be out there and people have to know what’s going on. If you’re a small business and you’re doing the wrong thing, they hunt you down. And when a small business does the wrong thing, it’s not going to dodge millions of dollars.”
Strong says he hopes the ATO data will continue to provoke a conversation about big business and tax.
“It takes time [to crack down on big business],” Strong says.
“With small business it’s normally pretty quick, you either put your hands up or they find you innocent. Whereas big business they have lots of solicitors and that sort of thing. So I understand it takes time – just as long as they [the ATO] don’t give up.”
COMMENTS
SmartCompany is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while it is being reviewed, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.